Masakazu Toyoda

Seeking to build optimal governance
The
Special
Committee
for
Improving
Governance,
launched
in
December
2018,
has
two
main
tasks.
The
first
is
to
gain
a
clear
understanding
of
the
source
of
problems
from
the
system
under
the
previous
chairman
in
order
to
build
a
system
of
governance
under
which
such
problems
will
not
reoccur.
The
other
task
is
to
create
the
optimal
governance
necessary
to
carry
out
a
transformation
of
the
company.
In
order
to
tackle
those
two
tasks,
discussions
were
carried
out
with
professionals
that
included
company
executives,
lawyers,
and
former
judges,
for
approximately
three
months.
One
thing
that
left
an
impression
on
me
was
the
words
of
Co-Chair
Sadayuki
Sakakibara,
who
said,
“We
need
to
further
develop
Nissan,
which
is
a
star
company
in
the
Japanese
auto
industry,
so
that
it
becomes
a
true
global
star
company.”
All
the
committee
members
shared
the
thoughts
and
ideas
of
Co-Chair
Sakakibara,
which
will
be
realized
in
the
construction
of
an
optimal
system
of
governance.
The
conclusion
reached
was
the
need
to
separate
the
functions
of
execution
and
supervision
and
to
transfer
into
a
company
with
three
statutory
committees
through
the
increase
in
number
of
independent
outside
directors.
Nissan
transitioned
to
a
company
with
three
statutory
committees
in
June
2019,
which
involved
the
participation
of
independent
outside
directors,
with
different
experiences
and
backgrounds,
who
engaged
in
lengthier
discussions
than
were
ever
carried
out
before
at
Nissan.
It
is
worth
noting
that
all
of
us
serving
as
independent
outside
directors
are
highly
motivated
to
contribute
to
a
desirable
outcome.
Our
greatest
mission
as
independent
outside
directors
is
to
protect
the
interests
of
minority
shareholders.
At
the
same
time,
a
major
part
of
our
job
is
to
help
generate
a
win-win
relationship
with
Renault,
which
owns
43%
of
Nissan’s
shares,
and
Mitsubishi
Motors,
which
Nissan
owns
major
shares.
Improving
governance
is
important
not
only
for
Nissan
employees
but
for
all
stakeholders.
In
order
for
the
seven
independent
outside
directors
to
fulfill
our
role
in
promoting
executive
management
improvements,
we
had
to
build
a
relationship
whereby
we
could
reach
a
prompt
consensus,
while
respecting
each
other’s
opinions.
The
Independent
Director
Conference
(IDC)
also
plays
a
key
role.
Rather
than
merely
being
a
formal
organization,
the
IDC
functions
to
propose
improvements
on
the
basis
of
strong
mutual
relationships.
Even
during
the
COVID-19
crisis,
the
IDC
convenes
frequently
through
online
meetings
to
pool
the
members’
resources
by
creating
awareness
of
our
respective
strengths.
In
discussing
the
transformation
plan
“Nissan
Next,”
there
was
not
enough
time
for
the
Board
of
Directors
to
discuss
this
on
their
own,
so
executive
officers
were
asked
the
IDC
to
also
participate
in,
and
in
some
cases,
this
resulted
in
holding
extraordinary
meetings
of
the
Board
of
Directors.
In
a
sense,
the
IDC
played
the
role
as
a
lubricating
oil
to
facilitate
the
relationship
between
execution
and
supervision.

A highly transparent process to cultivate successors is vital to sustainable growth
I
think
the
Nomination
Committee
has
three
main
roles.
The
first
is
to
decide
on
the
agenda
content
regarding
the
appointment
or
dismissal
of
directors
submitted
to
the
General
Meeting
of
Shareholders.
Another
role
is
to
determine
the
agenda
content
for
appointment
or
dismissal
of
representative
executive
officers
presented
to
the
Board
of
Directors.
The
third,
and
I
think
the
most
important
role,
is
to
draft
the
succession
plan
for
the
next
CEO
and
verify
it
annually.
It
is
extremely
important
that
we
build
a
process
for
choosing
and
cultivating
the
successive
leader
for
Nissan’s
further
development
50
years
ahead.
In
Japan,
there
are
not
many
companies
that
have
transitioned
to
three
statutory
committees.
Therefore,
not
much
know-how
has
been
developed
regarding
how
to
utilize
the
experience
and
knowledge
of
independent
outside
directors
in
cultivating
the
next
corporate
leader.
We
conducted
sessions
with
individuals
from
other
companies
that
have
established
nomination
and
other
committees
to
learn
best
practices,
but
ultimately,
I
think
we
will
have
to
create
a
succession
plan
that
best
suits
Nissan
through
a
process
of
trial
and
error.
From
the
time
the
Nissan
Next
plan
was
released,
we
focused
on
creating
the
succession
plan
and
finding
appropriate
candidates
based
on
360
degree
evaluations
conducted
by
executive
management.
At
present,
we
have
basically
completed
our
selection
of
Group
1.
Moving
forward,
the
Nomination
Committee
will
conduct
repeated
interviews
with
the
candidates,
while
at
the
same
time
formulate
a
plan
to
nurture
the
candidates
to
help
them
overcome
their
weak
points,
thereby
fostering
the
sort
of
personnel
needed
to
take
over
the
leadership
of
the
company.
Nissan
is
a
company
with
deep-rooted
diversity,
and
if
an
executive
has
the
right
qualities
to
lead
the
company
toward
future
prosperity,
his
or
her
nationality
is
not
an
issue.
Since
there
is
a
diverse
range
of
human
resources
under
consideration,
we
need
to
first
gain
a
clear
understanding
of
each
candidate.
The
process
of
selecting
and
fostering
candidates
is
time
consuming,
but
given
the
extreme
importance
of
this
task,
those
of
us
involved
with
the
Nomination
Committee
and
the
HR
division
need
to
be
resolute
in
our
efforts.
As
the
chair
of
the
Nomination
Committee,
it
is
gratifying
to
see
the
enthusiasm
of
the
other
committee
members.
In
addition,
over
the
past
20
years,
one
person,
the
previous
chairman,
has
decided
on
the
appointment
and
compensation
of
around
50
executives.
Therefore,
the
HR
division
does
not
have
experience
in
cultivating
a
prospective
CEO.
As
a
consequence,
I
think
the
HR
division
will
develop
its
knowledge
and
knowhow
through
its
participation
in
this
process.
If
we
can
build
a
succession
plan
that
is
highly
transparent,
I
believe
that
Nissan
will
serve
as
an
example
of
best
practices
in
Japan.
Maximizing the potential of Nissan
Nissan
launched
its
new
management
system
in
December
2019,
but
CEO
Makoto
Uchida
and
executive
management
faced
a
challenging
situation
in
trying
to
restore
lost
trust
while
also
dealing
with
the
major
impact
that
the
COVID-19
pandemic
has
had
on
the
auto
industry.
However,
through
repeated
discussions
of
proposals
for
structural
reforms,
the
new
executives
were
able
to
understand
each
other’s
strengths
and
weaknesses,
which
resulted
in
a
stronger
sense
of
unity.
The
Nissan
Next
plan
is
also
outstanding,
and
through
its
implementation,
we
are
advancing
improvements
at
a
faster
pace
than
originally
planned.
The
results
of
the
new
management
system,
led
by
CEO
Makoto
Uchida,
COO
Ashwani
Gupta
and
EVP
Hideyuki
Sakamoto,
is
already
generating
results
and
regaining
its
self-confidence.
As
we
move
forward,
it
is
important
to
first
promote
Nissan
Next
in
accordance
with
the
plan.
However,
in
order
to
realize
sustainable
growth,
we
will
need
to
formulate
a
long-term
plan
as
soon
as
possible.
At
the
same
time,
it
is
also
vital
that
we
have
a
communication
plan
to
build
a
healthy
relationship
with
our
stakeholders.
Some
of
the
independent
outside
directors
are
knowledgeable
in
this
field,
so
I
trust
that
they
will
provide
various
proposals.
When
it
comes
to
issues
related
to
the
environment
or
energy,
Nissan
occupies
a
leading
role
among
Japanese
companies.
For
electric
vehicles
(EVs)
and
autonomous
driving
technologies,
Nissan
has
been
propelling
the
auto
industry
forward
through
its
innovative
technologies,
but
it
seems
likely
that
Europe
and
China
will
accelerate
their
shift
to
EVs
in
the
years
ahead.
Autonomous
driving
technologies
have
the
potential
to
contribute
to
the
solution
of
various
social
problems,
such
as
the
use
of
driverless
taxis.
Nissan,
which
is
at
the
forefront
of
these
efforts,
can
be
expected
to
achieve
outstanding
results
related
to
ESG*
(environmental,
social
and
governance).
Therefore,
I
hope
the
company
will
move
forward
with
confidence.
The
auto
industry
is
now
undergoing
what
has
been
described
as
a
“once
in
a
century
transformation”
as
equipping
vehicles
with
information
systems
advances
rapidly.
This
makes
it
increasingly
difficult
for
just
one
company
to
respond
to
its
investment
needs
on
its
own.
In
order
to
survive,
it
is
essential
for
the
Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi
Alliance
to
implement
large-scale
investments
together
and
share
technologies
they
develop.
It
is
important
to
understand
each
other’s
strengths
and
weaknesses
and
reinforce
each
other
in
order
for
the
three
companies
to
co-exist
and
prosper
together,
and
I
believe
this
is
possible
under
the
Alliance.
- Environment, Social, Governance
Published in January 2021